Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karwan-I-Islami

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Woefully little participation after three relists. RL0919 (talk) 18:08, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Karwan-I-Islami

)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable religious organisation that also runs a high school for around 100 students. Mentioned by local media a couple of times – just like many nonprofits and schools all over the world get mentioned in local media on occasion – but I haven't been able to find anything suggestive of lasting notability per

WP:NCORP. No corresponding articles on ur-wiki or ks-wiki either. — kashmīrī TALK 00:45, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

References

  1. ^ Naseer, Ganai (2016-09-02). "Karwan-I-Islami chief meets Sri Sri ahead of All Party meeting, says it is not track II diplomacy". India Today.
  2. ^ "Follow proper SoPs, maintain social distancing in masjids during payers: Alama Hami". Kashmir Age. 25 April 2021.
  3. ^ "Hami decries passing of Triple Talaq bill in parliament". Press Trust Of Kashmir. 28 December 2018.
  4. ^ Naqash, Rayan (2016-11-09). "At the separatist meeting in Srinagar: Angry crowds and a resolve to continue with protests". Scroll.in.
  5. ^ "J&K Muslim clergy gears up for fight against liquor". DNA India. 2017-11-03.
Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 07:17, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
WP:NONPROFIT is a subsection of WP:NCORP. Anyhow, it fails WP:NONPROFIT criterion 1, too, since it is certainly not an international NGO (unless India and Kashmir are considered two separate countries).
Hami is borderline notable IMO. But just borderline. The vast majority of people quoted by journalists in everyday reporting are not suitable for inclusion in an encyclopaedia. — kashmīrī TALK 10:57, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
There's a distinction between the NCORP and NONPROFIT regarding thresholds for notability. Also, NB under "additional considerations": "Some organizations are local in scope, but have achieved national or even international notice." Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 11:23, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yet the organisation in question does not fulfil either. — kashmīrī TALK 11:35, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 03:27, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 00:41, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Bold third relist for further input.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 17:14, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.