Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kascha Papillon (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:18, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kascha Papillon

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ENT and GNG. Wouldn't have even met the last version of the defunct PORNBIO. Book coverage is passing mentions and complex ref bio is junk with "rumored" and "supposedly" peppered throughout, not good for a BLP, plus other performers that have ranked higher on that dubious list have been found to be not notable (Lily Thai and Kristara Barrington), few B-movie appearances were minor. Wikiuser20102011 (talk) 14:59, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 15:05, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 15:05, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 15:05, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 15:05, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. As with many other nominations of porn actors from the pre-digital area, it's entirely possible based on the article material that sufficient sources exist given someone having access to the right sources. However, the digital coverage is bad even by the standards of that era and we've got no evidence anything better does exist, so it's another one for the delete pile. The Drover's Wife (talk) 15:51, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:38, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable pornographic performer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:51, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hawaii-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:46, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Any claims of notability lack support from reliable sources. The Complex article has been debunked before as reliable source coverage. It is a listicle of one writer's opinion. Other claims of notability are not only poorly sourced, but they are also not as remarkable is they claim to be. • Gene93k (talk) 21:01, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete pernom. Borgia Venedict (talk) 13:47, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.