Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kate Crossan

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 22:12, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kate Crossan

Kate Crossan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails

WP:SINGER
. Searched Google and couldn't find any coverage of this person. Searched newspapers.com and there are a few trivial mentions of this person: 3 ads for workshops they hosted, 2 reviews of a CD her band put out, and 1 review of a music festival that mentions she will be there but she is not the focus of the article. I was only able to find this with her name Kate Crossan as her stage name returned nothing. There are only two references in the article one is a link to their personal website that doesn't load and another is a review of an album put out by a band that they were a member of.

Source assessment table:
Source
Independent?
Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward
GNG
?
Canadian Journal for Traditional Music Yes Appears to be a journal for reviews of music ? Website doesn't list any qualifications or academic departments or organizations aligned with this journal ~ Names Crossan as part of a band in a review. Nothing about the author or the article is included or able to be found. ? Unknown
Personal Website ? Returns a 404 error ? Returns a 404 error ? Returns a 404 error ? Unknown
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.
Dr vulpes (💬📝) 19:51, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ). No further edits should be made to this page.