Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kate Forster

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I'm basically treating this as a

WP:PROD, no opposition listed, and appears to lack notability. Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 02:07, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Kate Forster

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I initially declined the A7 speedy-delete for this biography as I found (and later added) two sources. But these are brief mentions only, not enough to support a BLP, not enough for the

WP:AUTHOR also does not appear to be met. The article's creator did not respond to my request for more sources, and I have not found any others myself. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 22:28, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the
talk) 06:29, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete - There is no significant coverage about her in reliable sources. She has one book out which appears to be self-published as it is published by Dogma, and per this, she was General Manager of commnications agency Dogma. According to teh article, she has book deal with Penguin which means she may become notable in the future, but not right now. -- Whpq (talk) 16:55, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:07, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.