Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kathy Pippy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:24, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kathy Pippy

Kathy Pippy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only two sources in the article, and both are fairly trivial mentions and not the most reliable sources. My own searches turned up nothing better to improve article. Appears the article subject doesn't meet

• Delete When I did find some sources, they appeared to have been written by (or copied by) the same person who produced this web page. cf here and here. So in addition to not saying much, it may be a copyright violation. LaMona (talk) 03:37, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:17, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:17, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:17, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Sir Joseph ^(talk) 16:38, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Not currently better solidly satisfying its notability. SwisterTwister talk 02:33, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - no brainer. Fairly blatant hype/promotion. Quis separabit? 05:28, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Searches show it fails
  WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:58, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.