Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kay Lee Ray
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 02:19, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
Kay Lee Ray
- Kay Lee Ray (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails
WP:ENTERTAINER. The only links are match stats and nothing else. Nothing in-depth or secondary. Domdeparis (talk) 10:08, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
]
Because the "professional wrestling career" section documents exactly that, her professional wrestling career. Cagematch is one of the most reliable sources for match results and is used in countless pro wrestling articles across the site. I suggest you read
WP:PW
and see what are listed as credible sources.
talk
) 11:46, 9 March 2017 (GMT)
- Comment Hi @WP:ENTERTAINER too. All pages have to meet GNG regardless of recommendations by different projects. I left a message on the talk page and originally tagged it as possibly not meeting notability, this was ignored I then PRODDED it with a detailed explanation this was ignored and removed so I had no choice. This is not the first article that you have created with the same problem this one was deleted too I suggest you read the comments especially those about independent news coverage by @NotTheFakeJTP: who is a member of the PW project. Domdeparis (talk) 12:09, 9 March 2017 (UTC)]
- Note: This debate has been included in the talk) 13:12, 9 March 2017 (UTC)]
- Note: This debate has been included in the talk) 13:12, 9 March 2017 (UTC)]
- Delete does not establish notability, sources are WP:ROUTINE. 86.3.174.49 (talk) 02:29, 10 March 2017 (UTC)]
- Delete - per above. Nikki♥311 01:29, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.