Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keith Manly
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. LFaraone 01:08, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keith Manly
- Keith Manly (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I'm listing this here at AfD per the request of a user claiming to be Keith Manly. The user has repeatedly tagged it as a speedy, but since there is some potential notability asserted and other users have edited the article, there's no clear cut case for a speedy here. I don't have any true opinion one way or another, although I am having a bit of trouble finding sources. Editors should note that he is under the name "Keith Manly" as well as "Keith E. Mann".
(｡◕‿◕｡) 17:13, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply
]
- I'd like to also state that while the article claims that Manly produced, directed, and wrote Evolution - Why Bother?, this book asserts that it was done by the American Institute of Biological Sciences. I know that they hire other people to help, but I can't really find anything to back up that Manly is this director other than his primary sources. If I could find one source on say, the AIBS site that backed him up as the director then this would go a long way towards establishing notability, if anyone can find this. (｡◕‿◕｡) 17:21, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete If the user can provide proof that he is Mr Manly to an administrator, then it ought be speedily deleted as per his request. Not sure why he would want his entry deleted, but I believe it should be done as a courtesy if that's what he wants. He doesn't appear to be particularly notable and there aren't any decent references anyway. Wouldn't be a great loss. -- talk 21:16, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete If the user can provide proof that he is Mr Manly to an administrator, then it ought be speedily deleted as per his request. Not sure why he would want his entry deleted, but I believe it should be done as a courtesy if that's what he wants. He doesn't appear to be particularly notable and there aren't any decent references anyway. Wouldn't be a great loss. --
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:54, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:54, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per lack of sources, and talk) 18:10, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.