Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kellie Pickler (album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and convert into a protected redirect to

96 14:14, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Kellie Pickler (album)

Not again. This keeps getting re-created without any sources at all. There are no reliable sources yet to verify the tracklist or anything else. This creation has a little more, so G4 doesn't apply. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 01:07, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. —Cliff smith ^talk 01:28, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless the title, track list and release date can be
reliable sources. Cliff smith ^talk 01:28, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete - per
X 01:35, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete per
WP:CRYSTAL. Recreate when it is sourced. JJL (talk) 01:39, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete, I can confirm the artwork and release date here at Amazon, but nothing on the track listing. For me, the track listing is quite a big part for the "completeness" of an album, so for the moment, it's a delete for me. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 01:43, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete only can find sources to prove title, release date, but nothing else like full tracklist. --Caldorwards4 (talk) 01:50, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - has a title, a tracklisting and a release date. what more could you want? --T-rex 04:03, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Changed to Delete - tracklisting was not as confirmed as I thought it was. As such this article is premature --T-rex 00:19, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as far as I've seen she's only mentioned the single released, the song w/ Taylor, and Rocks Instead of Rice - its even got a song listed on it that was from her previous album, like that would make sense CloversMallRat (talk) 11:26, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - added a source that verifies the release date of the album. The track listing may not be confirmed by a reliable source, but that doesn't mean the article should be deleted. Maher-shalal-hashbaz (talk) 19:02, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Actually, it does: until the title, release date and track list have all been
  WP:MUSIC. Cliff smith ^talk 20:32, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply
  ]
  - That's not at all what
    WP:MUSIC#Albums states. In fact, it explicitly states that "...properly and reliably referenced information about the album's recording process, such as known guest musicians, may be sufficient to justify an independent article." While I agree that a track listing is not appropriate until verified by reliable sources, the absence of that alone does not disqualify this article. Maher-shalal-hashbaz (talk) 20:47, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply
    ]
    WP:MUSIC states that: "Once the artist or their record label has publicly confirmed the title, track listing and release date, an article about the album is not a WP:CRYSTAL violation." Until then, this should be merged with Kellie Pickler. Cliff smith ^talk 21:05, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply
    ]
    Note that it does not state that "...until the artist or their record label has publicly confirmed the title, track listing and release date, an article about the album is a WP:N violation." Maher-shalal-hashbaz (talk) 21:11, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    There's just not enough verifiable content for its own article yet. Cliff smith ^talk 21:19, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It doesn't have enough info on the album. No cover, only 3 songs are listed. And that's not enough for it's own article. EnDaLeCoMpLeX (talk) 17:06, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.