Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kelly Hall (2nd nomination)
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Wifione Message 09:39, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Kelly Hall
AfDs for this article:
- Kelly Hall (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not indicate sufficient notability for inclusion. Cloudbound (talk) 21:22, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. She is a current model and winning Page 3 Idol would be sufficient notability. Tiller54 (talk) 15:17, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — frankie (talk) 17:09, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. — frankie (talk) 17:09, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relistedto generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The clock is ticking.... 00:06, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relistedto generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 01:28, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No reliable sourcing, no significant relevant GNews coverage. Winning an employee of the month-type award from a tabloid publishing her topless pictures does not indicate notability. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 19:10, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - in the past, we have tended to keep multiple-award winning models who get on Page 3 or Page 6 several times, but not just once in her career. Bearian (talk) 21:09, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as lacking in-depth coverage by reliable independent third party sources. ]
- Delete - No notability as far as I can see. Being a Page 3 model isn't very notable in and of itself, and the award she won isn't notable either as it's a magazine award only thing, like the Playboy Playmate award. --Madison-chan (talk) 15:29, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.