Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kelly Shore (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 09:59, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kelly Shore

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails PORNBIO and GNG. Most of the sourcing is cruft or links to pornsites and the one decent source - Salon - has clearly been included to bolster the credibility of the article as it isn't about this person, simply mentions that she wrote a blog about the subject they were reporting.

Spartaz ^Humbug! 08:09, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:50, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:53, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:53, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:53, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as fails PORNBIO & GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 21:40, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This sweep turns up empty and my other sweeps did not find anything either to establish
WP:GNG.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 01:08, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.