Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kendall Stewart (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on

"soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. . Note that Cewbot is incorrect; a soft deletion can only be inappropriate if deletion such as PROD was previously challenged, which has never happened. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 11:54, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Kendall Stewart

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is about a local city council member who doesn't seem to be notable for anything. The only coverage he has is for a single scandal and some extremely trivial mentions about other things that are barely related to him. None of it passes

WP:POLITICIAN. It's also worth mentioning that this article was deleted through an AfD in 2006 (apparently it wasn't enough notable for the lax rules back then) and was recreated without being improved at all. Apparently it wasn't even notable enough for the lax notability guidelines that were around back then. As far as I'm concerned, it should be deleted a second time. As he's not notability now either. --Adamant1 (talk) 14:28, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Note to closer for soft deletion: While this discussion appears to have
talk) 00:02, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Previous discussions: 2006-08 ✗ delete

Logs: 2006-08 ✗ deleted

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.