Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kerri Evelyn Harris

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

Kerri Evelyn Harris

Kerri Evelyn Harris (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Has been twice redirected, but the creator reverted the redirects. Failed election candidates do not have automatic notability, and I do not see anything in the article which asserts notability, Ymblanter (talk) 06:39, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect as one of the editors that originally requested a redirect. There's enough coverage to merit connecting the subject to the main article for the

United States Senate election in Delaware, 2018 Rosguill^talk 06:49, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Delaware-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:04, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:04, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:04, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect, at least until she does something more notable than losing a primary. --Coemgenus (talk) 14:07, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to
  United States Senate election in Delaware, 2018, no notability outside failed candidacy.E.M.Gregory (talk) 15:10, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Redirect per above - fails
  WP:GNG. SportingFlyer talk 06:18, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Redirect There is a difference between being the candidate of a major party, and the losing primary contestant. ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs)}~ 22:20, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect, no evidence of notability outside of the primary. BubbaJoe123456 (talk) 16:34, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, and then recreate a redirect after the edit history has been rendered unrevertable by deletion. People do not get Wikipedia articles just for being unsuccessful candidates in political party primaries, but this makes no credible claim that she has preexisting notability for other reasons independently of her unsuccessful candidacy. Bearcat (talk) 16:54, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect per above. The candidacy was notable, as part of the election, but the subject does not have notability outside of the one campaign. -LtNOWIS (talk) 18:07, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect for now. If she becomes more notable and runs in future elections, then I would say she can have a standalone article. Dough4872 22:28, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect This should now close per
  WP:SNOW due to overwhelming consensus. AmericanAir88^(talk) 01:48, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete or Redirect to
  WP:NPOL. Bkissin (talk) 14:46, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.