Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kiki's American Adventure

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.

✉ 14:59, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Kiki's American Adventure

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

WP:TVSHOW in that I could find no reliable published sources for this show. The sources currently on the article are problematic. Source #1 no longer works. Source #2 is about the actress, not the movie. Sources #3 and #4 aren't about either the movie or the actress. Overall, a completely unremarkable show. Kbabej (talk) 01:19, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Kbabej (talk) 01:24, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Kbabej (talk) 01:24, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Kbabej (talk) 01:31, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the

talk) 14:33, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

delete as proper sourcing not shown.
Spartaz ^Humbug! 18:14, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Kbabej (talk) 19:25, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Lacks significant non-routine coverage by reliable sources. The only reliable citations in the article confirm that San Fernando Valley is the porn capital of California, nothing about the show. The dead link was a database entry with episode air dates but no significant content. An independent search got a one-paragraph entry in an encyclopedia of television shows (1925–2010).[1] Not enough to establish notability. • Gene93k (talk) 19:37, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Kbabej (talk) 22:29, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The discussion here should take into account the recent Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kiki Vidis. Aoziwe (talk) 22:42, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
What the fuck? Immediately abort deletion! -rayukk | talk 13:20, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.