Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim Chae-uk
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. —Ganesha811 (talk) 21:21, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Kim Chae-uk
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Kim Chae-uk (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Can't find much coverage of him, very likely not notable
talk) 19:34, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the talk) 19:34, 6 January 2024 (UTC)]
- Keep. Meets WP:POLITICIAN that states that are presumed notable "Politicians and judges who have held international, national, or (for countries with federal or similar systems of government) state/province–wide office, or have been members of legislative bodies at those levels." The page indicates sources.-My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 20:25, 6 January 2024 (UTC)]
- Keep: Subject passes WP:NPOL, and being a member of the Politburo adds to the likelihood of sources existing. Curbon7 (talk) 21:31, 6 January 2024 (UTC)]
- Keep, nomination rationale is not convincing. Geschichte (talk) 13:22, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.