Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kin-Kon-Kan
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 07:02, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Kin-Kon-Kan
- Kin-Kon-Kan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A search for published (gBooks) references did not find support for this article as written, fails
WP:V. Article is about a binary-determination logic puzzle published by Nikoli. Jeepday (talk) 14:12, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply
]
- Note: This debate has been included in the talk) 22:32, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I don't know what "search for published (gBooks) references did not find support for this article as written" is even supposed to mean. Is gBooks a reference to Google Books? Is that a claim that only the English language books that Google happens to have searchable text copies of count as reliable sources? That's just wrong on so many different levels. DreamGuy (talk) 01:08, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Per secondary sources. Notability does not directly affect the content of articles, but only their existence." JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 11:56, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Per
- Delete - I don't doubt that the puzzle exists,a nd that we can verify the puzzle play with primary sources. What is missing is any sort of coverage from independent reliable sources to distinguish this puzzle as a notable one. -- Whpq (talk) 16:46, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply
- Delete - It appears that the puzzle does exist, but other then ]
- Comment It's a puzzle from the Japanese puzzle giant that introduced, inter alia, ]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.