Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kinect Rush 3: A Nicktoons Adventure

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Snow Delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:25, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kinect Rush 3: A Nicktoons Adventure

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I believe this is a fictitious game. Cannot find it reported on any reliable news sites or even on the developer's website. X201 (talk) 14:28, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the

list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) X201 (talk) 14:36, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete all - Seems to be a play on the words
Kinect Rush: A Disney-Pixar Adventure. That is, they colloborate with Disney-Pixar as Kinect Rush 1, Cartoon Network as Kinect Rush 2, and Nicktoons as Kinect Rush 3: A Nicktoons Adventure. The Pixar collaboration was noted in a June 4, 2012 news article,[1] soit seems unlikely that Kinect Rush would jump to a competitor so quickly. There's no sources for Rush 2 or 3 and Kinect Rush is not referred to as Kinect Rush 1. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 14:44, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

Speedy delete both as per Uzma Gama1. Lukeno94 (talk) 18:53, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Clear as
czar · · 19:58, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete This is
WP:SNOW if I ever saw one. §FreeRangeFrog 21:45, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete Making an assumption just based on what network the article creator loves more. For all we know, Kinect Rush 2 or 3 could throw us a curve and be A
chatter) 23:47, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete. Speculation. No sources confirming that this is the title of the third game.--xanchester (t) 00:36, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In fact we don't even have sources for the claimed second game in the series making this even less likely.--174.93.171.10 (talk) 01:40, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.