Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kinetico

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 15:04, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kinetico

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The only (possibly) independent source is an article about the company's acquisition. No claim of notability is made. Rentier (talk) 06:47, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 07:06, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 07:06, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: A company with over 40 years operating in its field but aside from occasional product reviews (such as "Popular Science" 1977) I am seeing only routine announcements around patents, the 2006 take-over of the company, etc.: insufficient to meet
WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 09:26, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete Fails
-- HighKing⁺⁺ 21:01, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete: pure business promo. Quis separabit? 03:35, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.