Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Klement Tinaj (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 11:45, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Klement Tinaj

Klement Tinaj (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable actor has become non-notable political dabbler; filled with fluff like what plays he was in in high school. Orange Mike | Talk 02:56, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 05:06, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albania-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 05:07, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 05:25, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 05:25, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. The references seem to be enough to pass
  WP:GNG. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 05:26, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete. Very poor sourcing. Clearly a
  SPEAK 06:07, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:11, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. improved the article a bit. There were many bad and dead sources. But I also found some sources regarding his California governor run. Peter303x (talk) 22:19, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Fails
  WP:GNG. — BriefEdits (talk) 07:49, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete The sourcing here is horrible and clearly full of badly-disguised PR connected to the man himself. These articles in particular are poorly written and wildly exaggerate his participation in Furious 7, where he was a background extra at best, and are full of lavish praise that clearly comes from the horse's mouth. His "run" for CA governor is only mentions of him among all the other filler candidates running and is not genuine coverage. All in all, there's little here that's actually notable beyond the dressup. Nohomersryan (talk) 07:58, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.