Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Knowledge in Islam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify. Tone 06:46, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Knowledge in Islam

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unclear how this essaylike piece warrants a standalone article. If not deleted, could be well integrated into the Islam page. nearlyevil 665 18:33, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. nearlyevil 665 18:33, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The topic is highly notable as there are many books about it. For example, see Knowledge Triumphant: The Concept of Knowledge in Medieval Islam. Andrew🐉(talk) 18:54, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify The topic is notable but this treatment of it is poor. It needs thorough sourcing in RIS rather than the Quran or it is just opinion or OR. Mccapra (talk) 20:04, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify Right now purely WP:OR in Essay Style. Has some potential but currently definitely not ready for mainspace.
talk) 20:35, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Draftify I reckon the topic being notable. I've personally discourses & works on it by the likes of
^(talk) 22:16, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Draftify: I'm the nominator and I support a draftify for the text to be fundamentally rewritten. nearlyevil 665 12:06, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: In what seems like an attempt to save the page from being sent to draftspace the author has copy pasted entire paragraphs from other Wikipedia articles, and potentially sources outside of Wikipedia as well (I haven't checked if all content comes from other wiki pages). Votes above might need a reevaluation. nearlyevil 665 18:33, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes now it’s just a gigantic ramble about nothing with loads of imported sources. As TheAafi says the topic is definitely notable but the article creator is getting into a mess. I still think draftify is the answer. If the creator can’t produce a decent article on this topic perhaps someone else will. Mccapra (talk) 21:25, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

^(talk) 01:11, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.