Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kotoka Shiiba

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted by

criterion G5. (Non-admin closure) "Pepper" @ 15:13, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

Kotoka Shiiba

Kotoka Shiiba (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Pro wrestler with no major accomplishments. Fails GNG since there is no significant coverage of him and no supporting evidence he meets

WP:ENTERTAINER. Mdtemp (talk) 14:54, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestler-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 15:11, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - it should be keeped beacause he won the open the brave gate champion and he was part of the stables (Windows,Millenials, and currently VerserK) and he is a Dragon Gate and he should have is article like every one in the Dragon Gate roster.

User:Puron123 16:39, 18 April 2016 (UTC)Puron123 (talkcontribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

  • Keep - it should be keeped beacause he won the open the brave gate champion and its just a matter of time until he wins a major title.

User:Gaterlover 17:28, 18 April 2016 (UTC)Gaterlover (talk Gaterlover (talkcontribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

  • Delete -- I am very suspicious of the users above, who voted to keep Maybe sockpuppets? Anyway, this article should be deleted. It fails
    AfC. Cheers, CookieMonster755 (talk) 18:53, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ). No further edits should be made to this page.