Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Krystal Jordan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 23:30, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Krystal Jordan

Krystal Jordan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Although she was an award nominee, I don't see much prospect for expansion here. Article is about a porn actress. Deepecologyfanboi (talk) 00:00, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:41, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. If this porn star was nominated for an AVN Award (which needs to be verified), she passes
  WP:BIO. Potential for eventual development is presumed. Right now, the article does not give specifics or cite any sources, so we'll have to check it out. • Gene93k (talk) 00:45, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply
  ]
  • Verification failed. See below. • Gene93k (talk) 00:58, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I don't think she has been nominated for an AVN Award. I've looked through all the AVN nominees over the past eight years and she isn't among them. Epbr123 (talk) 00:55, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Epbr123. She's performing since 2006. I just checked 2006, 2007 and 2008 AVN nominee lists. She's not any of them. • Gene93k (talk) 00:58, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Epbr123 and Gene93k. No evidence of notability per
  WP:BIO. Nsk92 (talk) 01:22, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete not notable and per the article's previous false claims of notability. ~ AmeIiorate
  T C @ 05:25, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete - I'm presuming bad faith in the false mention of the award nomination simply to establish notability. Morbidthoughts (talk) 07:02, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Makes totally non-verifiable claims such as "She is known for her cute looks and her voluptuous body, particularly her large buttocks." Give me a break. JBsupreme (talk) 08:42, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete non-notable actress who fails
  WP:V BTW "Article is about a porn actress" probably isn't a valid reason for deletion. Jasynnash2 (talk) 09:18, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete is clearly non-notable, 2006 is nothing compared to Jenna Jameson and on another note, I never knew that there was a WikiProject on Porn --Numyht (talk) 15:55, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.