Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kurt Rock

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 07:56, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kurt Rock

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable

WP:MUSICBIO, CSDs removed by IP. Original author frequently warned about self-removal of CSDs. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 00:56, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete. Not notable at all.
-- Calidum 05:03, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete - it appears there is no substantial sourcing information from
WP:RS. Jus da fax 09:19, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (relate) @ 14:32, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (cackle) @ 14:32, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete; References fail
GNG. --Mr. Guye (talk) 23:42, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Note -
WP:A10'ed should this article be deleted.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 21:38, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Strong Delete: All provided sources are user generated content. I note this article has already been speedied previously, in August. Dolescum (talk) 05:22, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Not only is it not notable, but it is very poorly written. Wrong of the author to add himself to the Metallica article as well. 4TheWynne^{(talk)(contribs)} 05:36, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.