Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kwame Motion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:45, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kwame Motion

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

WP:BIO. Man doing his job. Promo. UPE editor blocked. scope_creep^Talk 22:41, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete non-notable, another influencer. Sources don't show importance of the subject. Oaktree b (talk) 00:26, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete While the UPE had some articles that meet GNG, this one doesn't. FrederalBacon (talk) 00:32, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Sources are just contrived PR coverage of the meaningless "Top 50 Bloggers" award.-
KH-1 (talk) 06:30, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete Article is written from primary sources, all I find are press releases. --HuRistudent (talk) 14:14, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet and Ghana. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:55, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- I tried to find out a couple of notable sources which per
Wp:Independent source Its an interview. Surya^beej ^⋠talk⋡ 08:12, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.