Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/L.A. Confidential Presents: Knoc-turn'al
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect. No sense in deleting a valid search term with possibly useful history. Skomorokh 12:15, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
L.A. Confidential Presents: Knoc-turn'al
AfDs for this article:
Fails
WP:NALBUMS. The album failed to chart on Billboard [1] (or anywhere else I can see). Lack of significant coverage by reliable sources. Article has been tagged for total lack of references for over a year. Niteshift36 (talk) 21:40, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply
]
- Delete fails NALBUMS and is not a notable album by any other means. JBsupreme (talk) 08:43, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:24, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply
- Redirect to notability guideline for albums. No need for AfD. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 15:31, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- What part of the notability guideline says that for albums? I see may be merged it into discography, but nothing stating must be. So "no need for AfD" is really a matter of opinion and not policy. Niteshift36 (talk) 15:45, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- "Album articles with little more than a track listing may be more appropriately merged into the artist's main article or discography article, space permitting"'. Redirects are cheap, its a plausible search term, there's no need to delete. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 16:00, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- May, not must. So the mini-lecture about "no need for AfD" is simply uncalled for. Bringing it to AfD is not improper.Niteshift36 (talk) 16:06, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NW (Talk) 03:44, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- Cybercobra (talk) 06:01, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.