Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laiza Golf Club

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Going with keep for now. Please propose merger, if interested, on appropriate talk page. Missvain (talk) 23:52, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Laiza Golf Club

Laiza Golf Club (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PRODing will have no sense here so AfD. Just a Golf Club, perhaps created to establish some notability for Myanmar military personal (see [1]). It has polemic news mentions but fails clearly

talk) 08:42, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the
talk) 08:42, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply
]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Myanmar-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 11:16, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge into some suitable Kachin-related article (eg
    WP:N says that, even if a subject passes GNG, "editors may use their discretion to merge or group two or more related topics into a single article" and given the limited amount that needs to be said about the course (a paragraph or perhaps two), I suggest merging into another Kachin-related article. Currently it only links from Sumlut Gun Maw, "an officer of the Kachin Independence Army." Nigej (talk) 12:24, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply
    ]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 11:02, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:03, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Most of the coverage such as NY Times demonstrated by Andrew Davidson appears sufficient for WP:GNG. 185.205.142.77 (talk) 17:22, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.