Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lake Homes Realty (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 18:39, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lake Homes Realty

Lake Homes Realty (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company, article has been deleted twice (

1. PR release from company, not sigcov of it
2. About Don Logan selling his property, not sigcov of the company
3. PR release from company, not sigcov of it
4. Real estate listings of properties for sale
5. No mention of company
6. No mention of company
7. No mention of company
8. No mention of company
9. Brief mention
10. Real estate listings of properties for sale

If this AFD results in deletion, I also propose

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Alabama. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:31, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete (possible CSD G4?): An article by a new 11-edits-then-create-in-mainspace
  WP:SALT would seem reasonable at this time. AllyD (talk) 18:48, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete per all above. —Alalch E. 23:00, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. There was nothing notable last time and still nothing. Salt as well. Oaktree b (talk) 23:32, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• 'Delete and Salt as per nom. Wikipedia is not a platform for promotion.
  HighKing⁺⁺ 18:01, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete per
  everyone knows what we are and are not. Bearian (talk) 20:46, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete and recommend close — not much of a debate here. My reasoning for deletion is similar to the other editors above. No need to artifically draw this AfD out. KlayCax (talk) 21:08, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Tough call, but ultimately non-notable by GNG and NCORP guidelines. Shawn Teller (talk) 04:31, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.