Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lake Taminah
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to
]Lake Taminah
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Fails
WP:GEONATURAL as no information beyond location and statistics has been shown to exist. The only non-map/database coverage in the article is a brief mention from a climbing guide, however this source just says that it is along a route used by climbers and contains no relevant discussion of the lake itself. A BEFORE search returned only similar passing mentions in hiking guides and the like. –dlthewave ☎ 16:39, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Wyoming. –dlthewave ☎ 16:39, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
- Redirect to Lakes of Grand Teton National Park, not notable enough for a separate article. Reywas92Talk 19:08, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
- Redirect to Lakes of Grand Teton National Park per Reywas92. My search came up empty. Google Earth indicates lake is only 5 hectares (13 acres, 0.02 sq mi). --A. B. (talk • contribs • global count) 22:52, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
- Redirect. Agree with comments above. --Bduke (talk) 06:58, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
- Redirect to Lakes of Grand Teton National Park: the lake does not pass any notability guideline so it does not deserve its own article. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 08:50, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
- Redirect to Lakes of Grand Teton National Park. There is simply not enough information to make an encyclopaedic article about this lake. The nom.'s case is correct, and GEOLAND says
The number of known sources should be considered to ensure there is enough verifiable content for an encyclopedic article. If a Wikipedia article cannot be developed using known sources, information on the feature can instead be included in a more general article on local geography.
The more general article exists and the lake is included in the redirect target. Per Reywas92, this is not notable for a seperate article. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 06:47, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.