Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Larry Stephens (wrestler)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Shimeru (talk) 08:37, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Larry Stephens (wrestler)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced since 2007. No reliable sources found. -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 09:08, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. —-- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 09:12, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Obivious keep. A quick search found this ref to back up the tag-team title claim. Lugnuts (talk) 09:30, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I noticed that the reference has been added to the NWA website - I don't know about whether this is counted as a reliable source or not, but the reference merely lists that he fought, it is not significant coverage about Larry himself -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 09:31, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per
talk) 12:47, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete -
WP:ATHLETE presumably applies, and this individual does not meet the criteria. Claritas (talk) 14:49, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

Well

WP:ATHLETE states "People who have competed at the fully professional level of a sport", which this guy has, and he won a major title while doing so. Lugnuts (talk) 16:55, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Keep Unless you want to start precedent which will lead to us going through and wholesale deleting all Professional Wrestlers because they are not mentioned in
WP:ATHLETE. We have a source, he wrestled in the NWA and won a Tag-Team title, much less the years he spent in multiple organizations (which all those guys do).Trackinfo (talk) 23:02, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply
]
Comment I don't believe in wholesale deletion - however, there are other wrestling articles which are unreferenced - if I come across them, I will look for RS to add, and if I can't find any, I am willing to AfD them. If you look at my contributions over the last couple of weeks, you will see that there are as many articles which I have found references for which have been unreferenced since May 2007, as there are articles which I have brought to AfD. I don't bring articles to AfD unless I have looked for references at RS. -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 23:10, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There's a world of difference though between someone who is notable with no RS and someone who isn't notable with no RS. Then again, the WP:ATHLETE guidance isn't exactly comprehensive! Lugnuts (talk) 07:04, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep WP:ATHLETE definitely applies, and he easily makes the cut because he has competed at the fully professional level of his sport. GaryColemanFan (talk) 22:12, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Definitely notable, competed at the top level of his sport, won the NWA Tag Title. Obvious Keep--Curtis23's Us al ions 17:00, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above, with respects to the nominator. The subject does seem to fall under, and pass, the
notability criteria for athletes. Regards, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 01:28, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.