Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laser Gold

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.

SarahStierch (talk) 05:35, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Laser Gold

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The topic is a trademarked term for an industrial process and the article does nothing to describe the process, merely making promotional claims about it, referenced to primary or non-independent sources (or not at all). Articles on industrial processes are possible (see the excellent

Stuartyeates (talk) 04:32, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:17, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:17, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as commercial spam. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:42, 10 December 2013 (UTC).[reply]
Comment article creator admits a
WP:COI on his User:Tl14054 page.Martin451 23:20, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete per
WP:NOTADVERTISING. -- 101.119.15.205 (talk) 05:40, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete as advertisement and spam. If independent reliable sources can be found, and I say that in italics because I was unable to find sources, then we can reconsider.
t • c) 05:18, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.