Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Latin Asia (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:21, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Latin Asia

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article was deleted under AfD in 2007, unanimously, I might add. It was subsequently recreated a year or two later. Since then, no sources have been added. It had been deleted for being a non notable neologism. No evidence of the term having become notable since then. Everything said in the 2007 AfD still seems to stand. Safiel (talk) 16:55, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I can't find evidence that "Latin Asia" is a notable concept. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 18:31, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:49, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:49, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The problem is that both the old article, if you can see here, and the new article, were about rarely-used terms, all of which are being
Viet Nam? Does it refer to the mixed cultural inheritance of the Filipino people living in the diaspora? Bearian (talk) 21:35, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete As it has no sources, I think there is a possibility that the person who created this article invented the term to begin with, I did a quick google search for Latin Asia and can't see any of the results referring to the topic discussed in this article--
ChampionMan1234 05:48, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.