Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Latvia vs russia 2003

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 08:17, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Latvia vs russia 2003

Prod removed, thus listed here : Game report on a single, non-notable game Passportguy (talk) 19:43, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:10, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not a notable game, no sufficient content--Rmzadeh (talk) 20:10, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, I don't see the point about this entry. Punkmorten (talk) 21:17, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Latvia-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 22:03, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 22:03, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

HOLY CRAP KEEP KEEP KEEP ... no wait, I mean delete this horrid thing. No justification needed, really. — Twas Now ( talk • contribs • e-mail ) 08:55, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Non-notable single game. There isn't even any true assertion of notability in the article itself. I can't see why it was declined at CSD. – Nurmsook! ^talk... 09:24, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I'll just explain my rationale for declining the speedy. I felt, still feel in fact, that an international match is an inherent assertion of notability. I grant you that it wasn't mentioned specifically within the article. As the threshold for getting through a speedy is lower, I felt that this had just about enough, though it was always likely to fail an AfD, which appears to be the case. Ged UK 15:12, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. I'm sure that this match is well-remembered by Latvian ice-hockey fans, but I don't see any evidence of historical notability other than the underdogs winning against the team that they would take the greatest pleasure in beating. It didn't have any effect on the overall competition, the
Phil Bridger (talk) 13:09, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete - does not appear to be notable. Rlendog (talk) 14:30, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.