Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lee Busby (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. This is way too fast since the last nomination, and since nothing has changed, consensus being that the subject met the GNG, there really is no point in doing this again--per SNOW. Drmies (talk) 04:54, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lee Busby

Lee Busby (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

• Keep, as creator. Meets
  WP:BLP1E situation either, as there's coverage about him as a sculptor, cited in the article, predating his candidacy. The "Southern Living" article and video is quite in-depth; together with the election-related coverage we do have enough substance for an article. Sandstein 21:50, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Speedy keep Why are we renominating this after 1 month? —cnzx (talk • contribs) 22:23, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. The result of this article's
  WP:BEFORE prior to reviving a previous discussion. ―Matthew J. Long -Talk-^☖ 22:29, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep per above.
  talk) 00:52, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Merge to
  Rusf10 (talk) 03:21, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]
  • He has been established as being notable for other things. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 04:46, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:34, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:34, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:34, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:34, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Alabama-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:34, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Subject has been defined as meeting
  WP:NPOL is irrelevant. Renomination so soon could be seen as disruptive. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 04:46, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep per prior discussion. The election result doesn't change that he meets GNG. --HighFlyingFish (talk) 04:51, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.