Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Left Hand Creek (Colorado)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:01, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Left Hand Creek (Colorado)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability :)Ladsgroup^بحث 00:09, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~ Merge
Boulder County --Alpha Quadrant (talk) 01:32, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

Who claimed this article is a "map"? It's written in encyclopedic format. --Oakshade (talk) 05:28, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep- The nom has given absolutely no reason as to why they think this article should be deleted. Actual geographic feature that has received significant coverage from reliable sources no less. [1][2][3][4][5]--Oakshade (talk) 05:27, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:53, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep- per Wikipedia policy, geographic places, even a crossroads with two people in Afghanistan, is not subject to notability, the use to find it on a map is enough.--Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 02:45, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per Oakshade. Edward321 (talk) 14:19, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Oakshade. Geographic features are generally considered notable, especially with this much significant coverage. TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 06:22, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.