Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leon Lissek

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Daniel (talk) 14:19, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Leon Lissek

Leon Lissek (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The sourcing is atrocious here, not anywhere near even close to meeting GNG. I also am unconvinced that even one of the roles Lissek had would be considered a significant role in a notable production. I know there are some debates about what is a significant role, well in theory, in practice we seem to just mass create articles on anyone who shows up in cast lists a few times with no thought as to the roles being significant, but these roles are not. John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:58, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 22:05, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 22:05, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 22:05, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 16:18, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Clearly notable actor with plenty of notable credits. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:46, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep He's had a substantial number of roles according to the BFI Piecesofuk (talk) 18:22, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per DiamondRemley39 and Piecesofuk, meets
    WP:NACTOR. Deus et lex (talk) 23:44, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ). No further edits should be made to this page.