Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lesliana Pereira
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. MBisanz talk 10:05, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Lesliana Pereira
- Lesliana Pereira (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Does this sort of thing really belong on Wikipedia? ~Zoe O'Connell~ (talk) 11:54, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Five other winners from Miss Angola have their own pages. Why not six? I don't really mind but if you want to delete her you should delete the other five pages from the Miss Angola page to be consistent. SmokeyTheCat •TALK• 11:56, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- There's no substantial content on the page and the only three links are there are to Youtube videos. ~Zoe O'Connell~ (talk) 12:51, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - As Zoeoconnell has said there is no substantial content and there are no reliable links just links to YouTube videos. Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk | Sign 13:17, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. In my opinion, the precedent has been long established that participants in these contests are considered notable, even if there is insufficient biographical info to comply with ]
- delete'. doesn't seem to meet notability requirements. untwirl(talk) 18:44, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep How did she get into Miss Universe without winning Miss Angola? Either the article contains an error, or she's notable for passing round the regular rules. Current sourcing is only a problem if no reliable sources can be found. So far people who requested deletion do not appear to have searched for such sources as required by WP:BEFORE. Based on Google News reliable sources can readily be found. - Mgm|(talk) 09:43, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.