Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Let's Swing Again

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Singularity 08:09, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Let's Swing Again

Let's Swing Again (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Article violates policy at

• Delete
  94 17:15, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete per nom (or redirect to the main page for the artist) Gtstricky^{Talk or C} 17:31, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete for now, Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Hold off until sources can be found to verify the title, track listing, etc. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 17:47, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete doesn't even exist yet. -RiverHockey (talk) 18:00, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom, no objection to creating a redirect.
  talk) 22:08, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete. When we get more info. Happy Holidays!! Malinaccier (talk) 23:43, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong delete as violating
  WP:CRYSTAL totally.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 20:23, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletions. —User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 04:08, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.