Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LeverX

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Seraphimblade Talk to me 07:29, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

LeverX

LeverX (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

WP:NCORP. Sourced to lists of system integrators, SAP vendors, and trivial coverage of the company moving to Miami. ~ A412 talk! 19:41, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

  • "Good coverage" is not a criteria for establishing notability and the reference from American City Business Journals is a profile provided by the company. Hard to miss as it even says it is "in their own words". Fails ORGIND.
    HighKing++ 21:17, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 20:28, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment. While I appreciated the information about this company when I stumbled upon them months ago in course of my professional work, searching for sources and references I cannot get past the thought that it is just another software company. --Ouro (blah blah) 04:21, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete This is a company therefore GNG/
    HighKing++ 21:17, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ). No further edits should be made to this page.