Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lili Bosse

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:07, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lili Bosse

Lili Bosse (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a non-notable local elected official. She is only mayor because she is a city councilmember in a city that rotates the office of mayor annually among the councilmembers. Nearly all of the references are to

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Women, and California. Shellwood (talk) 14:38, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:41, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep There seems to be plenty of non-trivial coverage of her, once you add it all up. Including in Vogue. Many Beverly Hills mayors have articles on Wikipedia, and she seems to have enough press about her to qualify. Pyrrho the Skipper (talk) 16:51, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - the coverage of Bosse extends well beyond The Beverly Hills Courier. For example, I find two articles in a German paper from Berlin with one extended coverage on Bosse,^[1] and a second on her 2014 interactions with the Sultan of Brunei;^[2] the Los Angeles Times also regularly covers Bosse (e.g., ^[3]). Any concerns about tone can be edited and are not grounds for deletion (Wikipedia:Deletion is not cleanup). DaffodilOcean (talk) 18:16, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]