Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lilia Stepanova

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 06:03, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lilia Stepanova

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Lilia Stepanova (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Questionable notability of biographical article per

WP:BIO - no significant information to be found here to denote notability as most information is brief and does not explain themselves clearly. GUtt01 (talk) 09:52, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Moldova-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:03, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 20:07, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 20:07, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
WP:PROD
, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:19, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 17:24, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - articles like this are sufficient, and there are other
    non-English sources that are similar. The deletion rationale needs to be better here because the article itself lists the sort of coverage she has received and being a special guests on any one of those television shows would likely be considered more than "trivial". St★lwart111 03:16, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply
    ]
WP:DAILYMAIL is not a reliable source. --Darth Mike(talk) 14:51, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply
]
Indeed, but we don't need to rely on the reliability of the source itself, it is simply confirmation of a non-controversial fact; that she appeared on television. In doing so, she received coverage. As I said, the article itself lists the non-trivial coverage she has received from multiple reliable sources (which need not be print sources). St★lwart111 23:16, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The television appearances aren't sufficient? St★lwart111 23:16, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
In my opinion, no. Numerous people are on TV, all the time. Most aren't notable. --Darth Mike(talk) 19:30, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Many television appearances aren't coverage of the person, that's true, but these are appearances where she has been invited as a guest and the subject receiving coverage is her and her talents / skills. They aren't a matter of her appearing on television incidentally, in relation to something else. St★lwart111 02:10, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Probably just scrapes into
    WP:BIO. Leaning towards delete but not sure. Vladimir.copic (talk) 05:24, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Lilia_Stepanova&oldid=1040875038"