Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Linda Louise Duan

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Given that Joaomufc has been blocked. Sandstein 08:41, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Linda Louise Duan

Linda Louise Duan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable indivual lacking in-depth, non-trivial support. reddogsix (talk) 18:44, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: -- agree she is
    insufficiently notable actress for standalone article. Quis separabit? 18:51, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply
    ]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talkcontribs) 19:02, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talkcontribs) 19:04, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:25, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:25, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Save -- it has already been decided to keep her.Voicebox64 (talk) 19:50, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep I added two additional sources that indicate some notability. ABY 124431132 (talk) 01:17, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep - The local newspapers articles cited in the article seem to be sufficiently in-depth to confer notability. Deryck C. 12:35, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:07, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:46, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

keep meet notability in some sources. Emily Khine (talk) 19:43, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.