Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Linda Stern Zisquit

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.

(non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 05:11, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Linda Stern Zisquit

Linda Stern Zisquit (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article does not demonstrate notability. Was proposed for deletion in the past using the

template for unreferenced BLPs; that was only removed because it was the incorrect template, as the article was not wholly unreferenced. – Fayenatic London 06:52, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 08:37, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 08:37, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 08:37, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 08:37, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 08:38, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 08:38, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Added a few sources I think its enough --Shrike (talk) 09:05, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. The Jerusalem Post profile demonstrates notability, and being a finalist for a national award helps, too. pburka (talk) 22:47, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep but add more reliable sources. the only independent source at the moment is the Jerusalem Post. I did find one book review at PW which should add some notability. I didn't check other book review sources and I don't know the Israeli sources so I can't check those but presumably they exist. Lamona (talk) 06:42, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. It's usually hard to find reliably published reviews of poetry books, but I found and added eight reviews of five of her books; I think that's enough for
    WP:ARTIST #4d. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:51, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ). No further edits should be made to this page.