Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa (TV series)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 03:53, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Lisa (TV series)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Lisa (TV series) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Zero in-depth sourcing currently. Was redirected, hoping to have it improved, but was not. Due to the commonality of the name, searches were difficult, but not enough in-depth sourcing to show that it passes notability criteria. Onel5969 TT me 14:16, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television, Germany, and Sweden. Shellwood (talk) 14:24, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. As has been noted, searching is difficult due to the commonality of the names – "Lisa" is an extremely common Swedish name and "Magnus Carlsson" is the name of famous Swedish singer Magnus Carlsson; even in combination with the name of the television network, this means that a search mainly leads to hits about pop music. But I tried to dig through the dominating modern Swedish media archive (sv:Mediearkivet) and have added a number of sources to the article. None of them are fantastic, and most of them focus mainly on Carlsson, the creator of the series, with some content specifically about Lisa, but not all of them, and there's enough here to convince me that the article can be kept. /Julle (talk) 19:05, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep -- as of now, there are sufficient reliable and independent citations and coverage of the subject to meet the GNG. matt91486 (talk) 05:54, 9 January 2023 (UTC)]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 22:32, 14 January 2023 (UTC)- Linguist111 (talk) 00:21, 22 January 2023 (UTC)]
- Delete. Fails ]
- In what way does it fail NTV? NTV's essay simply says that series are likely to be notable if broadcast on a network. matt91486 (talk) 07:00, 28 January 2023 (UTC)]
- In what way does it fail NTV? NTV's essay simply says that series are likely to be notable if broadcast on a network.
- Comment - of the current sourcing, none are from independent, reliable, secondary sources which go in-depth about the subject. Despite the efforts of Julle.Onel5969 TT me 12:08, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 01:24, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.