Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa Robertson (television)
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:57, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Lisa Robertson (television)
- Lisa Robertson (television) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not to be confused with any other person of the same name, the subjec of this minimally referenced biography is a TV presenter on QVC. The article is essentially a paraphrase of the QVC page on her. Press reporting seems largely limited to passing mentions and a stalking case some years back. No doubt well-known thanks to her work, but not necessarily "notable" in the
WP:N Wikipedia sense. Not much here here really. Angus McLellan (Talk) 22:37, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply
]
- Delete She's been mentioned a lot in passing, but I don't think the coverage is significant enough to meet ]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:36, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply
- Delete per ThemFromSpace, mainly because of the paraphrase, which I found quite close. Airplaneman talk 03:08, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete non notable biography. There is a lack of a properly referenced body of work. Stormbay (talk)
- KeepThis article should be reinstated and should not of been deleted.I see less notable people with less information and no referenced body of work having biographies listed on Wikipedia.Also almost everyone article or biography is a paraphrase from where the contributor has copy and pasted it from somewhere else.Laker44 (talk) 20:52, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.