Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List Of Social Login Providers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 20:46, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

List Of Social Login Providers

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is not encyclopedic content. This is just a directory. Just a list of social web sites that have a certain option. Vanjagenije (talk) 02:50, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete
Wikipedia indeed is not a directory. Mr. Guye (talk) 03:18, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Keep Yes this article is to help the developers who are looking to integrate social login to their site. It list popular social networks which allows social login. As far as the list is concerned, I would say that there are many such lists available on wikipedia. And I am sure that such list help readers as they get all the data on a single page. --Princekapoor (talk) 07:24, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 06:59, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 06:59, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:47, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete We already have this [[1]], and the non-OAuth login providers listed strike me as non-notable
talk) 15:11, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 08:30, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 04:57, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (
Talk to my owner:Online 06:20, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.