Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Angband variants
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Merge to ) 2007-03-03 07:50Z
List of Angband variants
- )
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletions. -- Mermaid from the Baltic Sea 06:47, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
List of non-notable games. Crufty. Begs for spam. Almost none of the games here are notable, and Wikipedia is an encyclopedia of notable subjects, not a fan resource or title dump. Wokinlone 06:04, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I vote either to keep, or to merge into the main Angband page. User:RogerBarnett:RogerBarnett 01:05, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- All you really just did is invoke WP:JUSTAVOTE. Not really going to help this discussion. Debates are centered on the quality of the arguments, not how many people think something. 65.99.214.90 03:50, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- All you really just did is invoke
- Merge popular ones into Angband (computer game), or delete altogether if it cannot be established which variants are popular or otherwise notable. The list as it exists has no encyclopedic value and belongs on Angband-centered resources. Conscious 11:19, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I just today came to WP with the goal of finding an Angband variant with a particular attribute. This list could use some cleanup, but I believe that it is valuable. I vote to keep, as it is far too cumbersome to be merged in the main article. Also note that this list is greatly pared down from other "1001 variants" pages on other sites. An attempt should be made to insure that the items on this list are notable. Marvin01 | talk 16:24, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, possibly merge; the point of the article is not whether these are individually notable; it is to convey how many variants of Angband there are, and how widely different they are in what they change. Thanks, Luc "Somethingorother" French 06:54, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Doug Bell talk 21:17, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - list of non-notable material, unsourced, fails ]
- Delete, spam-listcruft per nom. If a list does not demonstrably exist to display notable information, then it has no place on Wikipedia. Deiz talk 00:34, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and possibly merge. Just because items are not individually notable, this does not mean that they are not collectivly notable. These seem collectivly notable to me, and thus deserving of this list article. Mermaid from the Baltic Sea 05:53, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Wikipedia is not a collection of random data or lists. I'm already having a bad day, and finding this just made it worse ! WMMartin 14:02, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to the main Angband page. Most of these are indeed non-notable and no one plays them. Grue 15:23, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Moreschi, Deiz. Per Grue, notable variants can be listed on Angband, or not at all. Angus McLellan (Talk) 20:11, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.