Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Austin City Limits performers
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:55, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
List of Austin City Limits performers
- List of Austin City Limits performers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Indiscriminate, unsourced, and loooooooooong list of everyone who's ever performed on Austin City Limits. Not a source in sight, no real notability in relation to the series (literally thousands of performers). Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Chirps•Clams•Chowder) 23:37, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete In each article, it already probably covers these appearances. May I ask, did you try to prod this? REVIEW ME 23:58, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I'm not sure whether you asked this question because you believed TenPoundHammer should have or shouldn't have prod-ed. However my view is that prod-ing any article that's had a dozen or more editors, as this one has, is an abuse of that process. Prod is for uncontroversial deletes: the deletion of articles which multiple people have worked on should always be considered controversial. AndyJones (talk) 12:22, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep A potentially useful list, being long or potentially so is not a valid reason for deletion. The series is notable, the artists are notable and their appearances on the show are notable. As for unsourced, the external link [1] at the end of the page, to the ACL site itsself, sources the article almost fully and reliably. Russeasby (talk) 00:06, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep while the list strikes me as a list for it's own sake, I have to assume that it's useful for someone and as Russeasby says the fact that it is a long list isn't a reason for deletion. --Deadly∀ssassin 10:14, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. All we have to do is to make a table.--Freewayguy Call? Fish 23:56, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.