Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of CM Punk Matches in AEW

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

List of CM Punk Matches in AEW

List of CM Punk Matches in AEW (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No such other page exists and this isnt even notable in the first place Muur (talk) 22:26, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. Muur (talk) 22:29, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: The article has no source. And Punk in his career has wrestled in many places, ROH, TNA, WWE, why should his AEW matches be exclusively listed? And there are many wrestlers in WWE and AEW, we don't need to go listing evry single matches they had for a particular promotion, if that was the case there have been far more important wrestlers than Punk (Hogan, Flair, Hart, Austin) who deserves that honor. This is pure CM Punk WP:Fancruft. Dilbaggg (talk) 22:50, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly
  Talk to my owner:Online 22:54, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:56, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge as appropriate to CM Punk. Agree that this does not need to be a standalone list. Jclemens (talk) 00:19, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

doesnt even deserve to be a redirect.Muur (talk) 05:58, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as
  WP:FANCRUFT, no other lists exist of this sort of nature that I could find. Ajf773 (talk) 10:11, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete, far too much detail.
  McPhail (talk) 13:07, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete, WP FANCRUFT. Not needed a redirect. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 13:21, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, it appears to be out of wiki scope. Captain Jack Sparrow (talk) 16:34, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, Pure
  WP:FANCRUFT and per above, definitely out of WP scope. Spf121188 (talk) 17:18, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete. Seriously, who thought this was a good idea? oknazevad (talk) 19:15, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• It appears to be
  SNOWing. Spf121188 (talk) 19:38, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete, Pure
  WP:SNOW. Deathlibrarian (talk) 01:51, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete Textbook fandom-related stuff.
  Mann Mann (talk) 05:18, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete Looks like a fan-made article rather than an encyclopedic article.Juggyevil (talk) 14:38, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.