Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Chronicles of the Cursed Sword characters

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.

Spartaz Humbug! 07:14, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

List of Chronicles of the Cursed Sword characters

List of Chronicles of the Cursed Sword characters (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completely unsourced and incapable of meeting the standards for a

WP:NOTPLOT without sufficient real-world context. Shooterwalker (talk) 04:12, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:25, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:25, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:25, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:25, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Same rationale as at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Skulduggery Pleasant characters (2nd nomination): this might ideally be very selectively merged, but it's not reasonable to expect someone to actually do that unless for some reason they're keen to, and it's not clear that this list would provide a useful basis for the sort of list that might reasonably be included as a section in the main article. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 23:08, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: there's no reliable independent sources for this article. Do not see these passing mentions, but if they exist, they're better suited to a few sentences in the main article. Jontesta (talk) 01:17, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - While I normally would not be opposed to a selective Merge as suggested above, the fact that not a single bit of information in this article is actually referenced to reliable sources means that it really should not be preserved. Rorshacma (talk) 20:57, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.