Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Criterion Collection LaserDisc releases

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to List of Criterion Collection DVD and Blu-ray releases. Sandstein 09:01, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

List of Criterion Collection LaserDisc releases (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Holsheimer (talk) 14:17, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Indiscriminate, no
  WP:LISTN. FOARP (talk) 15:46, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Note: This discussion has been included in the

talk) 20:49, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

• Delete per
  WP:NOTCATALOGUE. Ajf773 (talk) 21:23, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Merge to List of Criterion Collection DVD and Blu-ray releases. They are very much connected. Holsheimer (talk) 11:14, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge as above as a notable list subject with coverage in reliable sources as shown in the parent article, no valid reason for deletion except
  WP:IDONTLIKEIT Atlantic306 (talk) 21:35, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• Merge per above suggestion; this is a highly-curated and acclaimed series of films, hardly the Relativity Media Moissanite Collection of a bunch of bargain bin regulars. A retitle of the article to
  chatter) 06:57, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Merge to List of Criterion Collection DVD and Blu-ray releases. I also don't think this should be outright deleted as the article correctly lists the items concerning notable subjects. Sdmarathe (talk) 03:36, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment No keep rationale has been presented other than
  WP:ILIKEIT. FOARP (talk) 21:41, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Move to sister project. This is extremely valuable information for users, and it might be in some way appropriate for WP to include it. But we now have a much better way, whih is Wikidata. I'm not sure how we wouldgo about making references from WP articles to relevant Wikidata searches that would provide this sort of linked information, but we should figure out how. .(I point out that it would be appropriate for each individual item of information to be in WP also, as part of the relevant filmography.For important films and other media,, we do cover multiple releases, sometimes in detail. DGG ( talk ) 05:47, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.