Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Eureka Seven mecha

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no censensus; I don't see much likelihood of consensus developing at this time. Mojo Hand (talk) 20:57, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

List of Eureka Seven mecha

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is an overly in-depth list of

notability for the topic, so this is something better suited to brief descriptions on the character list and Wikia. TTN (talk) 22:09, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete. Does not satisfy
WP:LISTN. Consists entirely of in-universe plot details. I'm not sure where you find all this stuff, but I do know that it belongs on Wikia. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:20, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

WP:INUNIVERSE is a style problem which can be fixed, but not a sufficient reason for deletion. VMS Mosaic (talk) 03:07, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Keep. There is nothing wrong with in-universe details. Just have one of those banners on top of the page saying it needs some citations. Yapool Seijin (talk) 01:15, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep These mecha are an integral part of the series, and in my opinion this list is comparable to lists of characters for other works of fiction. --
talk) 03:25, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Keep for reasons already given, plus it passes the requirements of
WP:FICT#Lists of fictional elements. VMS Mosaic (talk) 08:56, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 09:24, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 09:24, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 09:24, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 09:24, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non-notable in-universe list. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 09:32, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So non-notable that virtually every aspect of that franchise is affected by it including merchandise. Yapool Seijin (talk) 20:12, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. It's the same reason why we don't have a list of swords for Bleach, list of magic for Harry Potter, or list of Stands from Jojo. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 06:03, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That is quite weird, if done correctly they would pass this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:FICT#Lists_of_fictional_elements Yapool Seijin (talk) 13:30, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete
WP:LISTN is a guideline, I see no evidence that this article proves crucial to the understanding of the series. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 18:37, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Meets
WP:SALAT, etc. VMS Mosaic (talk) 03:07, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,

SarahStierch (talk) 01:35, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.